Why we Support Chicago 2016
  About   |   Contact   |   Donate   |   Site Map   |   About Islam   |   Activist Corner   >> Today is Tuesday, April 21, 2015  
Our News
Our Multimedia
CAIR-Chi in the Press
Action Alerts
Press Releases
Media Monitor
Hate Watch
The Scoop
Civil Rights Center
Intern Center
Volunteer Center
Career Center
Resource Center
Report An Incident
Write to the Media
Request A Speaker
Make A Donation
Become A Member
Annual Events
Our Partners
The Mobilizer Blog
MYLS Website
Our Old Site | Oldest
Contact us

Racism can be unequal offender
April 17, 2007

by Ahmed M. Rehab,1,6049960.story

Here is an interesting point to ponder: What if Don Imus had referred to a mostly white women's basketball team as "dumb blond hos." Would it have been any less racist or sexist than the comment he used against a mostly black team?

Not in my book; by all accounts, it would be just as sexist and, given that blond hair is a racial feature no less than coarse hair is, it would be just as racist.

Would it have caused the same uproar culminating in his termination after 30 years on the job?

Probably not.

Is there a double standard going on here?

Yes there is.

Is it warranted?

Yes it is.

Here's why: Though both slurs are comparable in theory, the practical repercussions they have on the lives of the women they target are in no way comparable, a factor that seems to be missed by many commentators.

In other words, the "dumb blond" stereotype does not bear the same impediment against the social normalization of blond women that the vile stereotype of black women perpetrated by Imus does.

It would be foolish to deny that in terms of opportunity, America remains a place where black women are among the most disadvantaged and blond women among the relatively privileged. Black women walking into job interviews still face a very real concern that they should never have to face: "Do I intimidate you?"

Blond women don't.

This does not mean that it is OK to stereotype blond women by any means.

What it does suggest is that racist statements against minorities who suffer vulnerabilities go beyond the tasteless and into the dangerous because they have a direct negative impact on how they are perceived and dealt with.

It is more so spineless than it is tasteless to jokingly cast black women, who are already the single most socially disadvantaged demographic group in this country, as inner-city good-for-nothing crack heads, prostitutes or gangsters, given the reality of the everyday racism they face on the ground.

It is particularly remarkable when you have a group of black women, who have done everything right, worked hard, gone to college and excelled academically and athletically, that can still be slapped down with that stereotype.

Many apologists for Don Imus have thrown around the "he is an equal opportunity offender" argument.

No he is not; he couldn't be even if he tried for the simple reason that victims of racial offense themselves face unequal opportunity in our society.

Let's not factor that out of the equation.


Copyright © 2007, The Chicago-Tribune

First Name:

Last Name:


I liked it          I didn't like it    I am indifferent   



28 E. Jackson Blvd, Suite 1700, Chicago, IL 60604 | T: (312) 212-1520 | F: (312) 212-1530
| Our News | News Briefs | Action Alerts | Press Center | Events/Workshops | In the News | Volunteer Center | Media Monitor | Resource Center | Report An Incident |
Request A Speaker | Make A Donation | Downloads | Multimedia | The Scoop | Our Partners | Careers | Interns | Newsletter | Contact Us | Proud To Be Muslim |
All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2005-2011 © CAIR Chicago. Questions or Comments, Email

Site Designed by